[PATCH v2 2/3] io_uring/napi: fix io_napi_entry RCU accesses

[Olivier Langlois <olivier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

correct 3 RCU structures modifications that were not using the RCU
functions to make their update.

Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois <olivier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 io_uring/napi.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/napi.c b/io_uring/napi.c
index 1dd2df9da468..738d88bc050a 100644
--- a/io_uring/napi.c
+++ b/io_uring/napi.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ void __io_napi_add(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct socket *sock)
 	}
 
 	hlist_add_tail_rcu(&e->node, hash_list);
-	list_add_tail(&e->list, &ctx->napi_list);
+	list_add_tail_rcu(&e->list, &ctx->napi_list);
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock);
 }
 
@@ -91,9 +91,15 @@ static void __io_napi_remove_stale(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock);
+	/*
+	 * hash_for_each_safe() is not required as long as:
+	 * 1. hash_del_rcu() does not reset the deleted node next pointer
+	 * 2. kfree_rcu() delays the memory freeing until the next quiescent
+	 *    state
+	 */
 	hash_for_each(ctx->napi_ht, i, e, node) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, READ_ONCE(e->timeout))) {
-			list_del(&e->list);
+			list_del_rcu(&e->list);
 			hash_del_rcu(&e->node);
 			kfree_rcu(e, rcu);
 		}
@@ -207,6 +213,7 @@ void io_napi_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&ctx->napi_list);
 	hash_for_each(ctx->napi_ht, i, e, node) {
 		hash_del_rcu(&e->node);
 		kfree_rcu(e, rcu);
-- 
2.46.0