Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring/sqpoll: do not put cpumask on stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/16/24 4:20 AM, Felix Moessbauer wrote:
> Putting the cpumask on the stack is deprecated for a long time (since
> 2d3854a37e8), as the masks can be big. Given that, we port-over the
> stack allocated mask to the cpumask allocation api.
> 
> Fixes: f011c9cf04c0 ("io_uring/sqpoll: do not allow pinning outside of cpuset")
> Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  io_uring/sqpoll.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> index 7adfcf6818ff..004740d6577e 100644
> --- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> +++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> @@ -461,15 +461,22 @@ __cold int io_sq_offload_create(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		if (p->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQ_AFF) {
> -			struct cpumask allowed_mask;
> +			cpumask_var_t allowed_mask;
>  			int cpu = p->sq_thread_cpu;
>  
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&allowed_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> +				goto err_sqpoll;
> +			}
>  			if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))
>  				goto err_sqpoll;

This leaks allowed_mask... Probably allocate this _after_ we've already
sanity checked the 'cpu' value itself.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux