Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] block atomic writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] block atomic writes
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:01:08 -0400
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, jbongio@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-aio@xxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nilay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, agk@xxxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240610104329.3555488-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (John Garry's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:43:19 +0000")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

John,

> This series introduces a proposal to implementing atomic writes in the
> kernel for torn-write protection.

Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

References:
- [PATCH v8 00/10] block atomic writes
  - From: John Garry

Prev by Date: Re: [syzbot] [io-uring?] KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_cqe_overflow (3)
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [io-uring?] KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_cqe_overflow (3)
Previous by thread: [PATCH v8 09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support
Next by thread: [PATCH] io_uring/rsrc: don't lock while !TASK_RUNNING
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux