syzbot reports that recv is using an uninitialized value:
=====================================================
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_cqe_overflow io_uring/io_uring.c:810 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_complete_post io_uring/io_uring.c:937 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in io_issue_sqe+0x1f1b/0x22c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1763
io_req_cqe_overflow io_uring/io_uring.c:810 [inline]
io_req_complete_post io_uring/io_uring.c:937 [inline]
io_issue_sqe+0x1f1b/0x22c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1763
io_wq_submit_work+0xa17/0xeb0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1860
io_worker_handle_work+0xc04/0x2000 io_uring/io-wq.c:597
io_wq_worker+0x447/0x1410 io_uring/io-wq.c:651
ret_from_fork+0x6d/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
Uninit was stored to memory at:
io_req_set_res io_uring/io_uring.h:215 [inline]
io_recv_finish+0xf10/0x1560 io_uring/net.c:861
io_recv+0x12ec/0x1ea0 io_uring/net.c:1175
io_issue_sqe+0x429/0x22c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1751
io_wq_submit_work+0xa17/0xeb0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1860
io_worker_handle_work+0xc04/0x2000 io_uring/io-wq.c:597
io_wq_worker+0x447/0x1410 io_uring/io-wq.c:651
ret_from_fork+0x6d/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
Uninit was created at:
slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3877 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3918 [inline]
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4038 [inline]
__kmalloc+0x6e4/0x1060 mm/slub.c:4052
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:632 [inline]
io_alloc_async_data+0xc0/0x220 io_uring/io_uring.c:1662
io_msg_alloc_async io_uring/net.c:166 [inline]
io_recvmsg_prep_setup io_uring/net.c:725 [inline]
io_recvmsg_prep+0xbe8/0x1a20 io_uring/net.c:806
io_init_req io_uring/io_uring.c:2135 [inline]
io_submit_sqe io_uring/io_uring.c:2182 [inline]
io_submit_sqes+0x1135/0x2f10 io_uring/io_uring.c:2335
__do_sys_io_uring_enter io_uring/io_uring.c:3246 [inline]
__se_sys_io_uring_enter+0x40f/0x3c80 io_uring/io_uring.c:3183
__x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x11f/0x1a0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3183
x64_sys_call+0x2c0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:427
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
which appears to be io_recv_finish() reading kmsg->msg.msg_inq to decide
if it needs to set IORING_CQE_F_SOCK_NONEMPTY or not. If the recv is
entered with buffer selection, but no buffer is available, then we jump
error path which calls io_recv_finish() without having assigned
kmsg->msg_inq. This might cause an errant setting of the NONEMPTY flag
for a request get gets errored with -ENOBUFS.
Reported-by: syzbot+b1647099e82b3b349fbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 4a3223f7bfda ("io_uring/net: switch io_recv() to using io_async_msghdr")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index 0a48596429d9..7c98c4d50946 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -1127,6 +1127,9 @@ int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
retry_multishot:
+ kmsg->msg.msg_inq = -1;
+ kmsg->msg.msg_flags = 0;
+
if (io_do_buffer_select(req)) {
ret = io_recv_buf_select(req, kmsg, &len, issue_flags);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -1134,9 +1137,6 @@ int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
sr->buf = NULL;
}
- kmsg->msg.msg_inq = -1;
- kmsg->msg.msg_flags = 0;
-
if (flags & MSG_WAITALL)
min_ret = iov_iter_count(&kmsg->msg.msg_iter);
--
Jens Axboe
