Re: [PATCH] io_uring/rw: ensure retry isn't lost for write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/22/24 14:35, Anuj Gupta wrote:
In case of write, the iov_iter gets updated before retry kicks in.
Restore the iov_iter before retrying. It can be reproduced by issuing
a write greater than device limit.

Fixes: df604d2ad480 (io_uring/rw: ensure retry condition isn't lost)

Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  io_uring/rw.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 4fed829fe97c..9fadb29ec34f 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -1035,8 +1035,10 @@ int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
  	else
  		ret2 = -EINVAL;
- if (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE)
+	if (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE) {
+		iov_iter_restore(&io->iter, &io->iter_state);
  		return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;

That's races with resubmission of the request, if it can happen from
io-wq that'd corrupt the iter. Nor I believe that the fix that this
patch fixes is correct, see

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/Zh505790%2FoufXqMn@fedora/T/#mb24d3dca84eb2d83878ea218cb0efaae34c9f026

Jens, I'd suggest to revert "io_uring/rw: ensure retry condition
isn't lost". I don't think we can sanely reissue from the callback
unless there are better ownership rules over kiocb and iter, e.g.
never touch the iter after calling the kiocb's callback.

+	}
/*
  	 * Raw bdev writes will return -EOPNOTSUPP for IOCB_NOWAIT. Just

--
Pavel Begunkov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux