[PATCH for-next 2/4] io_uring: turn implicit assumptions into a warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



io_req_complete_post() is now io-wq only and shouldn't be used outside
of it, i.e. it relies that io-wq holds a ref for the request as
explained in a comment below. Let's add a warning to enforce the
assumption and make sure nobody would try to do anything weird.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index b7f742fe9d41..c84650b0f7f2 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -931,6 +931,13 @@ static void io_req_complete_post(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 
+	/*
+	 * All execution paths but io-wq use the deferred completions by
+	 * passing IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER and thus should not end up here.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_IOWQ)))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Handle special CQ sync cases via task_work. DEFER_TASKRUN requires
 	 * the submitter task context, IOPOLL protects with uring_lock.
@@ -948,7 +955,10 @@ static void io_req_complete_post(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
 	}
 	io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
 
-	/* called from io-wq submit work only, the ref won't drop to zero */
+	/*
+	 * We don't free the request here because we know it's called from
+	 * io-wq only, which holds a reference, so it cannot be the last put.
+	 */
 	req_ref_put(req);
 }
 
-- 
2.44.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux