Re: [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: add remote task_work execution helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/28/24 18:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
All our task_work handling is targeted at the state in the io_kiocb
itself, which is what it is being used for. However, MSG_RING rolls its
own task_work handling, ignoring how that is usually done.

In preparation for switching MSG_RING to be able to use the normal
task_work handling, add io_req_task_work_add_remote() which allows the
caller to pass in the target io_ring_ctx and task.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  io_uring/io_uring.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
  io_uring/io_uring.h |  2 ++
  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 9978dbe00027..609ff9ea5930 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1241,9 +1241,10 @@ void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
  	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
  }
-static inline void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned tw_flags)
+static inline void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req,
+					 struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+					 unsigned tw_flags)
  {
-	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
  	unsigned nr_wait, nr_tw, nr_tw_prev;
  	unsigned long flags;
@@ -1291,9 +1292,10 @@ static inline void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned tw_flags
  	wake_up_state(ctx->submitter_task, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
  }
-static void io_req_normal_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static void io_req_normal_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req,
+				   struct task_struct *task)
  {
-	struct io_uring_task *tctx = req->task->io_uring;
+	struct io_uring_task *tctx = task->io_uring;
  	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
  	unsigned long flags;
  	bool was_empty;
@@ -1319,7 +1321,7 @@ static void io_req_normal_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
  		return;
  	}
- if (likely(!task_work_add(req->task, &tctx->task_work, ctx->notify_method)))
+	if (likely(!task_work_add(task, &tctx->task_work, ctx->notify_method)))
  		return;
io_fallback_tw(tctx, false);
@@ -1328,9 +1330,18 @@ static void io_req_normal_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
  void __io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned flags)
  {
  	if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN)
-		io_req_local_work_add(req, flags);
+		io_req_local_work_add(req, req->ctx, flags);
+	else
+		io_req_normal_work_add(req, req->task);
+}
+
+void io_req_task_work_add_remote(struct io_kiocb *req, struct task_struct *task,
+				 struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned flags)

Urgh, even the declration screams that there is something wrong
considering it _either_ targets @ctx or @task.

Just pass @ctx, so it either use ctx->submitter_task or
req->task, hmm?

A side note, it's a dangerous game, I told it before. At least
it would've been nice to abuse lockdep in a form of:

io_req_task_complete(req, tw, ctx) {
	lockdep_assert(req->ctx == ctx);
	...
}

but we don't have @ctx there, maybe we'll add it to tw later.


+{
+	if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN)
+		io_req_local_work_add(req, ctx, flags);
  	else
-		io_req_normal_work_add(req);
+		io_req_normal_work_add(req, task);
  }
static void __cold io_move_task_work_from_local(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -1349,7 +1360,7 @@ static void __cold io_move_task_work_from_local(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
  						    io_task_work.node);
node = node->next;
-		io_req_normal_work_add(req);
+		io_req_normal_work_add(req, req->task);
  	}
  }
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index bde463642c71..a6dec5321ec4 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct file *io_file_get_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, int fd,
  			       unsigned issue_flags);
void __io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned flags);
+void io_req_task_work_add_remote(struct io_kiocb *req, struct task_struct *task,
+				 struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned flags);
  bool io_alloc_async_data(struct io_kiocb *req);
  void io_req_task_queue(struct io_kiocb *req);
  void io_req_task_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts);

--
Pavel Begunkov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux