Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/11] remove aux CQE caches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/16/24 7:27 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 3/16/24 11:52, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:53:21PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:29:50 +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> Patch 1 is a fix.
>>>>
>>>> Patches 2-7 are cleanups mainly dealing with issue_flags conversions,
>>>> misundertsandings of the flags and of the tw state. It'd be great to have
>>>> even without even w/o the rest.
>>>>
>>>> 8-11 mandate ctx locking for task_work and finally removes the CQE
>>>> caches, instead we post directly into the CQ. Note that the cache is
>>>> used by multishot auxiliary completions.
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>> [02/11] io_uring/cmd: kill one issue_flags to tw conversion
>>>          commit: 31ab0342cf6434e1e2879d12f0526830ce97365d
>>> [03/11] io_uring/cmd: fix tw <-> issue_flags conversion
>>>          commit: b48f3e29b89055894b3f50c657658c325b5b49fd
>>> [04/11] io_uring/cmd: introduce io_uring_cmd_complete
>>>          commit: c5b4c92ca69215c0af17e4e9d8c84c8942f3257d
>>> [05/11] ublk: don't hard code IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED
>>>          commit: c54cfb81fe1774231fca952eff928389bfc3b2e3
>>> [06/11] nvme/io_uring: don't hard code IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED
>>>          commit: 800a90681f3c3383660a8e3e2d279e0f056afaee
>>> [07/11] io_uring/rw: avoid punting to io-wq directly
>>>          commit: 56d565d54373c17b7620fc605c899c41968e48d0
>>> [08/11] io_uring: force tw ctx locking
>>>          commit: f087cdd065af0418ffc8a9ed39eadc93347efdd5
>>> [09/11] io_uring: remove struct io_tw_state::locked
>>>          commit: 339f8d66e996ec52b47221448ff4b3534cc9a58d
>>> [10/11] io_uring: refactor io_fill_cqe_req_aux
>>>          commit: 7b31c3964b769a6a16c4e414baa8094b441e498e
>>> [11/11] io_uring: get rid of intermediate aux cqe caches
>>>          commit: 5a475a1f47412a44ed184aac04b9ff0aeaa31d65
>>
>> Hi Jens and Pavel,
> 
> Jens, I hope you already dropped the series for now, right?

It's just sitting in a branch for now, it's not even in linux-next. I'll
review and look at a v2 of the series. So it hasn't moved anywhere yet.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux