On 3/14/24 9:55 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > On 24/03/13 06:40PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> OK, here they are. Two patches attached for every stable kernel, that >> gets rid of the remnants of the SCM related code: >> >> 5.4 >> 5.10 and 5.15 (same patches) >> 6.1 >> 6.6 >> 6.7 >> >> Would appreciate if Fedor and Pavel could give them a once over, but I >> think they are all fine. It's just deleting the code... > > Thank you, Jens! > > FWIW, I think it's all good and it eliminates the reported problem > obviously. Compiled and tested the repro with my kernel config. Great, thanks for checking! > Just a minor notice - stable rules declare two common ways for upstream > patch mentioning in backports [1]. And the first one starts from > lowercase. No big deal here definitely but maybe somebody has some > handling of these two variants - by regexps or similar, I actually don't > know. But I see in the git history that Greg also applies the variant > you've used. Honestly that doesn't matter, as long as the upstream commit is referenced. I always do it this way, not my first stable rodeo. -- Jens Axboe
