On 2/26/24 7:41 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 2/25/24 00:35, Jens Axboe wrote: >> For recvmsg, we roll our own since we support buffer selections. This >> isn't the case for sendmsg right now, but in preparation for doing so, >> make the recvmsg copy helpers generic so we can call them from the >> sendmsg side as well. > > I thought about it before, definitely like the idea, I think > patches 1-2 can probably get merged first. Yep, I'll queue 1 right now, and then just send patch 2 to netdev once patch 1 lands upstream. There's no rush on patch 2, half of it could have gone in months ago in fact. -- Jens Axboe
