Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:09:07 -0700
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxx>, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx, asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4cc1ba06-ecfd-b351-962e-27042767657e@samsung.com>

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:51:13PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> Does it sound any better if this 'super ring' type of ability is asked 
> explicitly by a setup flag say IORING_SETUP_CAPABLE_ONCE.

Just my opinion: that option sounds good!

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
  - From: Keith Busch
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
  - From: Kanchan Joshi

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux