Re: [PATCHv5 0/4] block integrity: directly map user space addresses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/1/23 7:04 PM, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> On 12/2/2023 7:01 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Jens already applied the latest series for the next merge. We can append
>>> this or fold atop, or back it out and we can rework it for another
>>> version. No rush; for your patch:
>> I folded this into the original to avoid the breakage, even if it wasn't
>> a huge concern for this particular issue. But it's close enough to
>> merging, figured we may as well do that rather than have a fixup patch.
>>
>> Please check the end result, both for-next and for-6.8/block are updated
>> now.
> 
> Looks good to me.
> May not matter now, so a symbolic
> Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx>

It still matters imho, because this thread is linked in the commit. So
even for the cases where I don't amend a commit to insert reviewed-bu
etc, I still think it's nice to have in the linked thread.

Ditto for the fixup - it's referenced in the original commit, and the
link will show you what that fixup was.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux