Re: [PATCH] io_uring/fs: consider link->flags when getting path for LINKAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/fs: consider link->flags when getting path for LINKAT
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:59:02 -0700
Cc: asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231120105545.1209530-1-cmirabil@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 11/20/23 3:55 AM, Charles Mirabile wrote:
> In order for `AT_EMPTY_PATH` to work as expected, the fact
> that the user wants that behavior needs to make it to `getname_flags`
> or it will return ENOENT.

Looks good - do you have a liburing test case for this too?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] io_uring/fs: consider link->flags when getting path for LINKAT
  - From: Charles Mirabile

References:
- [PATCH] io_uring/fs: consider link->flags when getting path for LINKAT
  - From: Charles Mirabile

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] io_uring: Statistics of the true utilization of sq threads.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/fs: consider link->flags when getting path for LINKAT
Previous by thread: [PATCH] io_uring/fs: consider link->flags when getting path for LINKAT
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/fs: consider link->flags when getting path for LINKAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux