Re: [PATCH 02/16] io_uring: cqe init hardening

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/15/23 11:31 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> io_kiocb::cqe stores the completion info which we'll memcpy to
> userspace, and we rely on callbacks and other later steps to populate
> it with right values. We have never had problems with that, but it would
> still be safer to zero it on allocation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index e189158ebbdd..4d27655be3a6 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static void io_preinit_req(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>  	req->link = NULL;
>  	req->async_data = NULL;
>  	/* not necessary, but safer to zero */
> -	req->cqe.res = 0;
> +	memset(&req->cqe, 0, sizeof(req->cqe));
>  }
>  
>  static void io_flush_cached_locked_reqs(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,

I think this is a good idea, but I wonder if we should open-clear it
instead. I've had cases in the past where that's more efficient than
calling memset.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux