On 8/9/23 19:28, Dmytro Maluka wrote: > So one of the questions I'm wondering about is: if Android implemented > preventing execution of any io_uring code by non-trusted processes > (via seccomp or any other way), how much would it help to reduce the > risk of attacks, compared to its current SELinux based solution? And why exactly I'm wondering about that: AFAICT, Android folks are concerned about the high likelihood of vulnerabilities in io_uring code just like we (ChromeOS folks) are, and that is the main reason why Android takes care of restricting io_uring usage in the first place.
