Re: [PATCH V3 00/16] io_uring/ublk: add IORING_OP_FUSED_CMD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/3/28 21:01, Ming Lei wrote:

[...]

>>
>>
>>> So re-using splice for this purpose is still bad not mention splice
>>> can't support writeable spliced page.
>>>
>>> Wiring device io buffer with context registered buffer table looks like
>>> another approach, however:
>>>
>>> 1) two uring command OPs for registering/unregistering this buffer in io fast
>>> path has to be added since only userspace can know when buffer(reference)
>>> isn't needed
>>
>> Yes, that's a good point. Registration replaces fuse master cmd, so it's
>> one extra request for unregister, which might be fine.
> 
> Unfortunately I don't think this way is good, the problem is that buffer
> only has physical pages, and doesn't have userspace mapping, so why bother
> to export it to userspace?
> 
> As I replied to Ziyang, the current fused command can be extended to
> this way easily, but I don't know why we need to use the buffer registration,
> given userspace can't read/write the buffer, and fused command can cover
> it just fine.
> 

Hi Ming, I have replied to you in another email.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux