Re: [PATCH] io_uring/uring_cmd: push IRQ based completions through task_work

[Kanchan Joshi <joshiiitr@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 8:51 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is similar to what we do on the non-passthrough read/write side,
> and helps take advantage of the completion batching we can do when we
> post CQEs via task_work. On top of that, this avoids a uring_lock
> grab/drop for every completion.
>
> In the normal peak IRQ based testing, this increases performance in
> my testing from ~75M to ~77M IOPS, or an increase of 2-3%.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> index 2e4c483075d3..b4fba5f0ab0d 100644
> --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> @@ -45,18 +45,21 @@ static inline void io_req_set_cqe32_extra(struct io_kiocb *req,
>  void io_uring_cmd_done(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd, ssize_t ret, ssize_t res2)
>  {
>         struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(ioucmd);
> +       struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
>
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 req_set_fail(req);
>
>         io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
> -       if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32)
> +       if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32)
>                 io_req_set_cqe32_extra(req, res2, 0);
> -       if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)
> +       if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) {
>                 /* order with io_iopoll_req_issued() checking ->iopoll_complete */
>                 smp_store_release(&req->iopoll_completed, 1);
> -       else
> -               io_req_complete_post(req, 0);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +       req->io_task_work.func = io_req_task_complete;
> +       io_req_task_work_add(req);
>  }

Since io_uring_cmd_done itself would be executing in task-work often
(always in case of nvme), can this be further optimized by doing
directly what this new task-work (that is being set up here) would
have done?
Something like below on top of your patch -

diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
index e1929f6e5a24..7a764e04f309 100644
--- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
+++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
@@ -58,8 +58,12 @@ void io_uring_cmd_done(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
ssize_t ret, ssize_t res2)
                smp_store_release(&req->iopoll_completed, 1);
                return;
        }
-       req->io_task_work.func = io_req_task_complete;
-       io_req_task_work_add(req);
+       if (in_task()) {
+               io_req_complete_defer(req);
+       } else {
+               req->io_task_work.func = io_req_task_complete;
+               io_req_task_work_add(req);
+       }
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_done);