On 3/16/23 12:13 PM, Li zeming wrote: > The function returns here and returns ret directly. It may look better. I think it'd be better to just initialize 'ret' to 0 instead. -- Jens Axboe
On 3/16/23 12:13 PM, Li zeming wrote: > The function returns here and returns ret directly. It may look better. I think it'd be better to just initialize 'ret' to 0 instead. -- Jens Axboe