[PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: Do not set PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on sqpoll threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Users may specify a CPU where the sqpoll thread would run. This may
conflict with cpuset operations because of strict PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
requirement. That flag is unnecessary for polling "kernel" threads, see
the reasoning in commit 01e68ce08a30 ("io_uring/io-wq: stop setting
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on io-wq workers"). Drop the flag on poll threads too.

Fixes: 01e68ce08a30 ("io_uring/io-wq: stop setting PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on io-wq workers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230314162559.pnyxdllzgw7jozgx@blackpad/
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx>
 io_uring/sqpoll.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
index 0119d3f1a556..9db4bc1f521a 100644
--- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c
+++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
@@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
 		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(sqd->sq_cpu));
 		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpu_online_mask);
-	current->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
 	while (1) {

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux