Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Add NULL checks for current->io_uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/11/23 10:19, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
As described in a previous commit 998b30c3948e, current->io_uring could
be NULL, and thus a NULL check is required for this variable.

In the same way, other functions that access current->io_uring also
require NULL checks of this variable.

io_uring_enter() {
...
	ret = io_uring_add_tctx_node(ctx);
	if (unlikely(ret))
		goto out;

	mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
	ret = io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit);
}

io_uring_add_tctx_node() should make sure to setup current->io_uring
or fail, so it should be NULL there, and SQPOLL should be fine as well.
Did you see it hitting NULL?



Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  io_uring/io_uring.c | 3 ++-
  io_uring/io_uring.h | 3 +++
  io_uring/tctx.c     | 9 ++++++++-
  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 2ac1cd8d23ea..8075c0880c7a 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -2406,7 +2406,8 @@ int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr)
  		/* try again if it submitted nothing and can't allocate a req */
  		if (!ret && io_req_cache_empty(ctx))
  			ret = -EAGAIN;
-		current->io_uring->cached_refs += left;
+		if (likely(current->io_uring))
+			current->io_uring->cached_refs += left;
  	}
io_submit_state_end(ctx);
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index ab4b2a1c3b7e..398c7c2ba22b 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ static inline void io_get_task_refs(int nr)
  {
  	struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
+ if (unlikely(!tctx))
+		return;
+
  	tctx->cached_refs -= nr;
  	if (unlikely(tctx->cached_refs < 0))
  		io_task_refs_refill(tctx);
diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.c b/io_uring/tctx.c
index 4324b1cf1f6a..6574bbe82b5d 100644
--- a/io_uring/tctx.c
+++ b/io_uring/tctx.c
@@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ int __io_uring_add_tctx_node_from_submit(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
  	if (ret)
  		return ret;
- current->io_uring->last = ctx;
+	if (likely(current->io_uring))
+		current->io_uring->last = ctx;
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -200,6 +201,9 @@ void io_uring_unreg_ringfd(void)
  	struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
  	int i;
+ if (unlikely(!tctx))
+		return;
+
  	for (i = 0; i < IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX; i++) {
  		if (tctx->registered_rings[i]) {
  			fput(tctx->registered_rings[i]);
@@ -259,6 +263,9 @@ int io_ringfd_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *__arg,
  		return ret;
tctx = current->io_uring;
+	if (unlikely(!tctx))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
  	for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
  		int start, end;

--
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux