Re: IORING_SEND_NOTIF_REPORT_USAGE (was Re: IORING_CQE_F_COPIED)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21/22 10:36, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Pavel,
[...]
Right, I'm just tired of back porting patches by hand :)

ok, I just assumed it would be 6.1 only.

I'm fine with 6.1 only, it'd make things easier. I thought from
your first postings you wanted it 6.0. Then we don't need to care
about the placing of the copied/used flags.

Otherwise we could have IORING_CQE_F_COPIED by default without opt-in
flag...

Do you still want an opt-in flag to get IORING_CQE_F_COPIED?
If so what name do you want it to be?

Ala a IORING_SEND_* flag? Yes please.

*_REPORT_USAGE was fine but I'd make it IORING_SEND_ZC_REPORT_USAGE.
And can be extended if there is more info needed in the future.

And I don't mind using a bit in cqe->res, makes cflags less polluted.


+static void io_uring_tx_zerocopy_callback_report_usage(struct sk_buff *skb,
+                            struct ubuf_info *uarg,
+                            bool success)
+{
+    struct io_notif_data *nd = container_of(uarg, struct io_notif_data, uarg);
+
+    if (success && !nd->zc_used && skb)
+        nd->zc_used = true;
+    else if (unlikely(!success && !nd->zc_copied))
+        nd->zc_copied = true;

It's fine but racy, so let's WRITE_ONCE() to indicate it.

I don't see how this could be a problem, but I can add it.

It's not a problem, but better to be a little be more explicit
about parallel writes.

ok.

diff --git a/io_uring/notif.h b/io_uring/notif.h
index 5b4d710c8ca5..5ac7a2745e52 100644
--- a/io_uring/notif.h
+++ b/io_uring/notif.h
@@ -13,10 +13,12 @@ struct io_notif_data {
      struct file        *file;
      struct ubuf_info    uarg;
      unsigned long        account_pages;
+    bool            zc_used;
+    bool            zc_copied;

IIRC io_notif_data is fully packed in 6.1, so placing zc_{used,copied}
there might complicate backporting (if any). We can place them in io_kiocb
directly and move in 6.2. Alternatively account_pages doesn't have to be
long.

As far as I can see kernel-dk-block/io_uring-6.1 alread has your
shrink patches included...

Sorry, I mean 6.0

So you want to backport to 6.0?

Find the current version below, sizeof(struct io_kiocb) will grow from
3*64 + 24 to 3*64 + 32 (on x64_64) to it stays within 4 cache lines.

I tried this first:

union {
   u8 iopoll_completed;
   struct {
     u8 zc_used:1;
     u8 zc_copied:1;
   };
};

But then WRITE_ONCE() complains about a bitfield write.

rightfully so, it can't be a bitfield as it would be racy
and not only in theory this time.


So let me now about the opt-in flag and I'll prepare real commits
including a patch that moves from struct io_kiocb to struct io_notif_data
on top.

Yeah, better to be opt-in, but apart from it and comments above
looks good.


diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index f5b687a787a3..189152ad78d6 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -515,6 +515,9 @@ struct io_kiocb {
      u8                opcode;
      /* polled IO has completed */
      u8                iopoll_completed;
+    /* these will be moved to struct io_notif_data in 6.1 */
+    bool                zc_used;
+    bool                zc_copied;
      /*
       * Can be either a fixed buffer index, or used with provided buffers.
       * For the latter, before issue it points to the buffer group ID,
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index ab7458033ee3..738d6234d1d9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ struct io_uring_cqe {
  #define IORING_CQE_F_MORE        (1U << 1)
  #define IORING_CQE_F_SOCK_NONEMPTY    (1U << 2)
  #define IORING_CQE_F_NOTIF        (1U << 3)
+#define IORING_CQE_F_COPIED        (1U << 4)

  enum {
      IORING_CQE_BUFFER_SHIFT        = 16,
diff --git a/io_uring/notif.c b/io_uring/notif.c
index e37c6569d82e..033aca064b10 100644
--- a/io_uring/notif.c
+++ b/io_uring/notif.c
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ static void __io_notif_complete_tw(struct io_kiocb *notif, bool *locked)
          __io_unaccount_mem(ctx->user, nd->account_pages);
          nd->account_pages = 0;
      }
+
+    if (notif->zc_copied || !notif->zc_used)
+        notif->cqe.flags |= IORING_CQE_F_COPIED;
+

As discussed above, should depend on IORING_SEND_ZC_REPORT_USAGE

      io_req_task_complete(notif, locked);
  }

@@ -28,6 +32,11 @@ static void io_uring_tx_zerocopy_callback(struct sk_buff *skb,
      struct io_notif_data *nd = container_of(uarg, struct io_notif_data, uarg);
      struct io_kiocb *notif = cmd_to_io_kiocb(nd);

+    if (success && !notif->zc_used && skb)
+        WRITE_ONCE(notif->zc_used, true);
+    else if (!success && !notif->zc_copied)
+        WRITE_ONCE(notif->zc_copied, true);
+
      if (refcount_dec_and_test(&uarg->refcnt)) {
          notif->io_task_work.func = __io_notif_complete_tw;
          io_req_task_work_add(notif);
@@ -55,6 +64,7 @@ struct io_kiocb *io_alloc_notif(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
      nd->account_pages = 0;
      nd->uarg.flags = SKBFL_ZEROCOPY_FRAG | SKBFL_DONT_ORPHAN;
      nd->uarg.callback = io_uring_tx_zerocopy_callback;
+    notif->zc_used = notif->zc_copied = false;
      refcount_set(&nd->uarg.refcnt, 1);
      return notif;
  }


--
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux