Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/27] io_uring zerocopy send

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/28/22 20:31, David Ahern wrote:
On 9/26/22 1:08 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
Tried it out, the branch below fixes a small problem, adds a couple
of extra optimisations and now it actually uses registered buffers.

     https://github.com/isilence/iperf iou-sendzc

thanks for the patch; will it pull it in.

Still, the submission loop looked a bit weird, i.e. it submits I/O
to io_uring only when it exhausts sqes instead of sending right
away with some notion of QD and/or sending in batches. The approach
is good for batching (SQ size =16 here), but not so for latency.

I also see some CPU cycles being burnt in select(2). io_uring wait
would be more natural and perhaps more performant, but I didn't
spend enough time with iperf to say for sure.

ok. It will be a while before I have time to come back to it. In the
meantime it seems like some io_uring changes happened between your dev
branch and what was merged into liburing (compile worked on your branch
but fails with upstream). Is the ZC support in liburing now?

It is. I forgot to put a note that I also adapted your patches
to uapi changes.No more notification slots but a zc send request
now can post a second CQE if IORING_CQE_F_MORE is set in the
first one. Better described in io_uring_enter(2) man, e.g.

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/liburing/tree/man/io_uring_enter.2#n1063

--
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux