On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:26 AM Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For IOCB_NOWAIT we're going to want to use try lock on the extent lock,
> and simply bail if there's an ordered extent in the range because the
> only choice there is to wait for the ordered extent to complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> index 1952ac85222c..3cdfdcedb088 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> @@ -1041,6 +1041,34 @@ void btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start,
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range - lock the passed range and ensure all pending
> + * ordered extents in it are run to completion in nowait mode.
> + *
> + * @inode: Inode whose ordered tree is to be searched
> + * @start: Beginning of range to flush
> + * @end: Last byte of range to lock
> + *
> + * This function returns 1 if btrfs_lock_ordered_range does not return any
> + * extents, otherwise 0.
Why not a bool, true/false? That's all that is needed, and it's clear.
Thanks.
> + */
> +int btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
> +
> + if (!try_lock_extent(&inode->io_tree, start, end))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, start, end - start + 1);
> + if (!ordered)
> + return 1;
> +
> + btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
> + unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, start, end);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> static int clone_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 pos,
> u64 len)
> {
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
> index 87792f85e2c4..ec27ebf0af4b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
> @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ void btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 nr,
> void btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start,
> u64 end,
> struct extent_state **cached_state);
> +int btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end);
> int btrfs_split_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 pre,
> u64 post);
> int __init ordered_data_init(void);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
