Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] io-uring/btrfs: support async buffered writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:26 AM Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch series adds support for async buffered writes when using both
> btrfs and io-uring. Currently io-uring only supports buffered writes (for btrfs)
> in the slow path, by processing them in the io workers. With this patch series
> it is now possible to support buffered writes in the fast path. To be able to use
> the fast path, the required pages must be in the page cache, the required locks
> in btrfs can be granted immediately and no additional blocks need to be read
> form disk.
>
> This patch series makes use of the changes that have been introduced by a
> previous patch series: "io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes"
>
> Performance results:
>   For fio the following results have been obtained with a queue depth of
>   1 and 4k block size (runtime 600 secs):
>
>                  sequential writes:
>                  without patch           with patch      libaio     psync
>   iops:              55k                    134k          117K       148K
>   bw:               221MB/s                 538MB/s       469MB/s    592MB/s
>   clat:           15286ns                    82ns         994ns     6340ns

This is very interesting information to not have in the git history,
specially because it's
exactly this that motivates all the patches.

I suggest adding this to the changelog of the last patch, and then
mention that those results
are the result of comparing a branch with the patchset versus one
without it, also mentioning
the subject of all the patches that belong to the patchset.

It should also mention how to run the test: i.e. the fio command line
or config file, so
that it's clear to everyone all the details and how to reproduce the results.

The patchset overall looks good to me, I just left a few comments on
most of the individual patches,
all minor things.

Thanks.

>
>
> For an io depth of 1, the new patch improves throughput by over two times
> (compared to the exiting behavior, where buffered writes are processed by an
> io-worker process) and also the latency is considerably reduced. To achieve the
> same or better performance with the exisiting code an io depth of 4 is required.
> Increasing the iodepth further does not lead to improvements.
>
>
> BTRFS changes:
>  -Add option for NOWAIT IOCB's to tell that searches do not wait on locks. This
>   adds the nowait option to btrfs_path.
>
>  -For NOWAIT buffered writes on PREALLOC or NOCOW extents tell can_nocow_extent()
>   that we don't want to wait on any locks or metadata IO.
>
>  -Support no_flush reservations for nowait buffered writes.
>
>  -Add btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range() function.
>
>  -Add nowait flag to btrfs_check_nocow_lock() to use it in write code path.
>
>  -Add nowait parameter to prepare_pages() function.
>
>  -Plumb nowait through the write code path.
>
>  -Enable nowait buffered writes.
>
>
> Testing:
>   This patch has been tested with xfstests, fsx, fio. xfstests shows no new
>   diffs compared to running without the patch series.
>
>
> Changes:
>
> V2:
>  - Replace EWOULDBLOCK with EAGAIN. In Version 1 it was not used consistently
>  - Export function balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags()
>  - Add asserts/warnings for search functions when nowait is set, but we don't
>    expect that they are invoked with nowait set.
>
>
> Josef Bacik (5):
>   btrfs: implement a nowait option for tree searches
>   btrfs: make can_nocow_extent nowait compatible
>   btrfs: add the ability to use NO_FLUSH for data reservations
>   btrfs: add btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range
>   btrfs: make btrfs_check_nocow_lock nowait compatible
>
> Stefan Roesch (7):
>   mm: export balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags()
>   btrfs: make prepare_pages nowait compatible
>   btrfs: make lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need nowait compatible
>   btrfs: btrfs: plumb NOWAIT through the write path
>   btrfs: make balance_dirty_pages nowait compatible
>   btrfs: add assert to search functions
>   btrfs: enable nowait async buffered writes
>
>  fs/btrfs/block-group.c    |   2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.c          |  48 ++++++++++++++-
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h          |   8 ++-
>  fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c |  13 +++-
>  fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.h |   3 +-
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c    |   5 ++
>  fs/btrfs/file-item.c      |   4 +-
>  fs/btrfs/file.c           | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c          |  22 ++++---
>  fs/btrfs/locking.c        |  23 +++++++
>  fs/btrfs/locking.h        |   1 +
>  fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c   |  28 +++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h   |   1 +
>  fs/btrfs/relocation.c     |   2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c          |   4 +-
>  fs/btrfs/space-info.c     |   3 +-
>  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c       |   6 +-
>  mm/page-writeback.c       |   1 +
>  18 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 53e99dcff61e1523ec1c3628b2d564ba15d32eb7
> --
> 2.30.2
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux