Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in __io_sync_cancel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/24/22 11:20 AM, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot tried to test the proposed patch but the build/boot failed:

Gah, that's the virtio-net issue that got fixed, not related. Maybe test
this one on master:

diff --git a/io_uring/cancel.c b/io_uring/cancel.c
index e4e1dc0325f0..5fc5d3e80fcb 100644
--- a/io_uring/cancel.c
+++ b/io_uring/cancel.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int __io_sync_cancel(struct io_uring_task *tctx,
 	    (cd->flags & IORING_ASYNC_CANCEL_FD_FIXED)) {
 		unsigned long file_ptr;
 
-		if (unlikely(fd > ctx->nr_user_files))
+		if (unlikely(fd >= ctx->nr_user_files))
 			return -EBADF;
 		fd = array_index_nospec(fd, ctx->nr_user_files);
 		file_ptr = io_fixed_file_slot(&ctx->file_table, fd)->file_ptr;

-- 
Jens Axboe



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux