Re: Adding read_exact and write_all OPs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/2/22 3:04 PM, Artyom Pavlov wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> In application code it's quite common to write/read a whole buffer and
> only then continue task execution. The traditional approach is to wrap
> read/write sycall/OP in loop, which is often done as part of a
> language std. In synchronous context it makes sense because it allows
> to process things like EINTR. But in asynchronous (event-driven)
> context I think it makes a bit less sense.
> 
> What do you think about potential addition of OPs like read_exact and
> write_all, i.e. OPs which on successful CQE guarantee that an input
> buffer was processed completely? They would allow to simplify user
> code and in some cases to significantly reduce ring traffic.

That may make sense, and there's some precedence there for sockets with
the WAITALL flags.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux