Re: [PATCH for-next 3/4] io_uring: grow a field in struct io_uring_cmd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Use the leftover space to carve 'next' field that enables linking of
io_uring_cmd structs. Also introduce a list head and few helpers.

This is in preparation to support nvme-mulitpath, allowing multiple
uring passthrough commands to be queued.

It's not clear to me why we need linking at that level?

I think the attempt is to allow something like blk_steal_bios that
nvme leverages for io_uring_cmd(s).

I'll rephrase because now that I read it, I think my phrasing is
confusing.

I think the attempt is to allow something like blk_steal_bios that
nvme leverages, but for io_uring_cmd(s). Essentially allow io_uring_cmd
to be linked in a requeue_list.


nvme failover steals all the bios from requests that fail (and should
failover) and puts them on a requeue list, and then schedules
a work that takes these bios one-by-one and submits them on a different
bottom namespace (see nvme_failover_req/nvme_requeue_work).

Maybe if io_kiocb could exposed to nvme, and it had some generic space
that nvme could use, that would work as well...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux