On 6/23/22 1:18 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 10:51:49AM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>> If iomap_write_iter() encounters -EAGAIN, return -EAGAIN to the caller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
>> index 83cf093fcb92..f2e36240079f 100644
>> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
>> @@ -830,7 +830,13 @@ static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
>> length -= status;
>> } while (iov_iter_count(i) && length);
>>
>> - return written ? written : status;
>> + if (status == -EAGAIN) {
>> + iov_iter_revert(i, written);
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + }
>> + if (written)
>> + return written;
>> + return status;
>
> Any particular reason for decomposing the ternary into this? It still
> looks correct, but it doesn't seem totally necessary...
>
Do you prefer this version?
+ if (status == -EAGAIN) {
+ iov_iter_revert(i, written);
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
return written ? written : status;
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --D
>
>> }
>>
>> ssize_t
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
