Re: [PATCH for-next 0/7] cqe posting cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/19/22 12:26, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
Apart from this patches removing some implicit assumptions, which we
had problems with before, and making code cleaner, they and especially
6-7 are also needed to push for synchronisation optimisations later, lile
[1] or removing spinlocking with SINGLE_ISSUER.

The downside is that we add additional lock/unlock into eventfd path,
but I don't think we care about it.

just in case there conflicts, it's based on top of

"[PATCH for-next 0/4] simple cleanups" from yesterday



The series also exposes a minor issue with cancellations, which for some
reason calls io_kill_timeouts() and io_poll_remove_all() too many times on
task exit. That makes poll-cancel to timeout on sigalarm, though usually
is fine if given 3-5 sec instead of 1. We'll investigate it later.

[1] https://github.com/isilence/linux/commit/6224f58bf7b542e6aed1eed44ee6bd5b5f706437

Pavel Begunkov (7):
   io_uring: remove extra io_commit_cqring()
   io_uring: reshuffle io_uring/io_uring.h
   io_uring: move io_eventfd_signal()
   io_uring: hide eventfd assumptions in evenfd paths
   io_uring: remove ->flush_cqes optimisation
   io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting
   io_uring: add io_commit_cqring_flush()

  include/linux/io_uring_types.h |   2 +
  io_uring/io_uring.c            | 144 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
  io_uring/io_uring.h            | 108 ++++++++++++++-----------
  io_uring/rw.c                  |   5 +-
  io_uring/timeout.c             |   7 +-
  5 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)


--
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux