[PATCH 5.19] io_uring: do not use prio task_work_add in uring_cmd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



io_req_task_prio_work_add has a strict assumption that it will only be
used with io_req_task_complete. There is a codepath that assumes this is
the case and will not even call the completion function if it is hit.

For uring_cmd with an arbitrary completion function change the call to the
correct non-priority version.

Fixes: ee692a21e9bf8 ("fs,io_uring: add infrastructure for uring-cmd")
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@xxxxxx>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 3aab4182fd89..a7ac2d3bce76 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5079,7 +5079,7 @@ void io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
 
 	req->uring_cmd.task_work_cb = task_work_cb;
 	req->io_task_work.func = io_uring_cmd_work;
-	io_req_task_prio_work_add(req);
+	io_req_task_work_add(req);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task);
 

base-commit: b13baccc3850ca8b8cccbf8ed9912dbaa0fdf7f3
-- 
2.30.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux