Re: [PATCH 0/3] io_uring: fixes for provided buffer ring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/13/22 12:08, Hao Xu wrote:
On 6/13/22 18:11, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
This fixes two problems in the new provided buffer ring feature. One
is a simple arithmetic bug (I think this came out from a refactor).
The other is due to type differences between head & tail, which causes
it to sometimes reuse an old buffer incorrectly.

Patch 1&2 fix bugs
Patch 3 limits the size of the ring as it's not
possible to address more entries with 16 bit head/tail

Reviewed-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>


I will send test cases for liburing shortly.

One question might be if we should change the type of ring_entries
to uint16_t in struct io_uring_buf_reg?

Why not? 5.19 is just rc2 now. So we can assume there is no users using
it right now I think?

It's fine to change, but might be better if we want to extend it
in the future. Do other pbuf bits allow more than 2^16 buffers?

--
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux