On 5/31/22 17:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 5/31/22 2:55 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
On 5/31/22 16:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 5/31/22 1:05 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
On 5/15/22 21:12, Hao Xu wrote:
From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This is the second version of fixed worker implementation.
Wrote a nop test program to test it, 3 fixed-workers VS 3 normal workers.
normal workers:
./run_nop_wqe.sh nop_wqe_normal 200000 100 3 1-3
time spent: 10464397 usecs IOPS: 1911242
time spent: 9610976 usecs IOPS: 2080954
time spent: 9807361 usecs IOPS: 2039284
fixed workers:
./run_nop_wqe.sh nop_wqe_fixed 200000 100 3 1-3
time spent: 17314274 usecs IOPS: 1155116
time spent: 17016942 usecs IOPS: 1175299
time spent: 17908684 usecs IOPS: 1116776
About 2x improvement. From perf result, almost no acct->lock contension.
Test program: https://github.com/HowHsu/liburing/tree/fixed_worker
liburing/test/nop_wqe.c
v3->v4:
- make work in fixed worker's private worfixed worker
- tweak the io_wqe_acct struct to make it clearer
Hi Jens and Pavel,
Any comments on this series? There are two coding style issue and I'm
going to send v5, before this I'd like to get some comment if there is
any.
I'll try to find some time to review it, doing a conference this week.
No worries.
Rebasing on the current for-5.20/io_uring branch would be a good idea
anyway.
I'll do that.
When you do, most/all patches also have:
From: Hao Xu <haoxu.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
which is a bit confusing, so probably choose one and go with that :-)
Sure
