hi,
> On 5/28/22 6:28 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/28/22 3:45 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
>>> hi Hao,
>>>
>>>> Hi Xiaoguang,
>>>>
>>>> On 5/26/22 20:38, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
>>>>> One big issue with file registration feature is that it needs user
>>>>> space apps to maintain free slot info about io_uring's fixed file
>>>>> table, which really is a burden for development. Now since io_uring
>>>>> starts to choose free file slot for user space apps by using
>>>>> IORING_FILE_INDEX_ALLOC flag in accept or open operations, but they
>>>>> need app to uses direct accept or direct open, which as far as I know,
>>>>> some apps are not prepared to use direct accept or open yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> To support apps, who still need real fds, use registration feature
>>>>> easier, let IORING_OP_FILES_UPDATE support to choose fixed file slot,
>>>>> which will return free file slot in cqe->res.
>>>>>
>>>>> TODO list:
>>>>> Need to prepare liburing corresponding helpers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/io_uring.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 +
>>>>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>>>> index 9f1c682d7caf..d77e6bbec81c 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>>>> @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ struct io_rsrc_update {
>>>>> u64 arg;
>>>>> u32 nr_args;
>>>>> u32 offset;
>>>>> + u32 flags;
>>>>> };
>>>>> struct io_fadvise {
>>>>> @@ -7970,14 +7971,23 @@ static int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> +#define IORING_FILES_UPDATE_INDEX_ALLOC 1
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int io_rsrc_update_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
>>>>> const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + u32 flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->files_update_flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (unlikely(req->flags & (REQ_F_FIXED_FILE | REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT)))
>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>> - if (sqe->rw_flags || sqe->splice_fd_in)
>>>>> + if (sqe->splice_fd_in)
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + if (flags & ~IORING_FILES_UPDATE_INDEX_ALLOC)
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + if ((flags & IORING_FILES_UPDATE_INDEX_ALLOC) && READ_ONCE(sqe->len) != 1)
>>>> How about allowing multiple fd update in IORING_FILES_UPDATE_INDEX_ALLOC
>>>> case? For example, using the sqe->addr(the fd array) to store the slots we allocated, and let cqe return the number of slots allocated.
>>> Good idea, I'll try in patch v2, thanks.
>>> Jens, any comments about this patch? At least It's really helpful to our
>>> internal apps based on io_uring :)
>> I like this suggestion too, other thoughts in reply to the original.
> BTW, if you have time, would be great to get this done for 5.19. It
> makes the whole thing more consistent and makes it so that 5.19 has
> (hopefully) all the alloc bits for direct descriptors.
Yeah, I have free time now, will prepare new version today.
Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang
>
