On 5/13/22 6:49 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 5/13/22 13:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/13/22 4:24 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> If an opcode handler semi-reliably returns -EAGAIN, io_wq_submit_work()
>>> might continue busily hammer the same handler over and over again, which
>>> is not ideal. The -EAGAIN handling in question was put there only for
>>> IOPOLL, so restrict it to IOPOLL mode only.
>>
>> Looks good, needs:
>>
>> Fixes: 90fa02883f06 ("io_uring: implement async hybrid mode for pollable requests")
>>
>> unless I'm mistaken.
>
> It's probably more of
>
> Fixes: def596e9557c9 ("io_uring: support for IO polling")
Yes, I think you are right and it goes back further. I'll get it queued
up, thanks!
--
Jens Axboe
