On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:21:12AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:02 PM Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx> wrote:
This adds the struct io_uring_cqe_extra in the structure io_uring_cqe to
support large CQE's.
Co-developed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index ee677dbd6a6d..6f9f9b6a9d15 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ enum {
#define IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED (1U << 6) /* start with ring disabled */
#define IORING_SETUP_SUBMIT_ALL (1U << 7) /* continue submit on error */
#define IORING_SETUP_SQE128 (1U << 8) /* SQEs are 128b */
+#define IORING_SETUP_CQE32 (1U << 9) /* CQEs are 32b */
enum {
IORING_OP_NOP,
@@ -201,6 +202,11 @@ enum {
#define IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS (1U << 1)
#define IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA (1U << 2)
+struct io_uring_cqe_extra {
+ __u64 extra1;
+ __u64 extra2;
+};
+
/*
* IO completion data structure (Completion Queue Entry)
*/
@@ -208,6 +214,12 @@ struct io_uring_cqe {
__u64 user_data; /* sqe->data submission passed back */
__s32 res; /* result code for this event */
__u32 flags;
+
+ /*
+ * If the ring is initialized with IORING_SETUP_CQE32, then this field
+ * contains 16-bytes of padding, doubling the size of the CQE.
+ */
+ struct io_uring_cqe_extra b[0];
};
Will it be any better to replace struct b[0] with "u64 extra[ ]" ?
With that new fields will be referred as cqe->extra[0] and cqe->extra[1].
And if we go that route, maybe "aux" sounds better than "extra".
sorry, picked v1 (rather than v2) here. This part in same though.