Re: [PATCH v1 01/11] io_uring: support CQE32 in io_uring_cqe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:21:12AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:02 PM Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx> wrote:

This adds the struct io_uring_cqe_extra in the structure io_uring_cqe to
support large CQE's.

Co-developed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index ee677dbd6a6d..6f9f9b6a9d15 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ enum {
 #define IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED        (1U << 6)       /* start with ring disabled */
 #define IORING_SETUP_SUBMIT_ALL        (1U << 7)       /* continue submit on error */
 #define IORING_SETUP_SQE128    (1U << 8)       /* SQEs are 128b */
+#define IORING_SETUP_CQE32     (1U << 9)       /* CQEs are 32b */

 enum {
        IORING_OP_NOP,
@@ -201,6 +202,11 @@ enum {
 #define IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS      (1U << 1)
 #define IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA   (1U << 2)

+struct io_uring_cqe_extra {
+       __u64   extra1;
+       __u64   extra2;
+};
+
 /*
  * IO completion data structure (Completion Queue Entry)
  */
@@ -208,6 +214,12 @@ struct io_uring_cqe {
        __u64   user_data;      /* sqe->data submission passed back */
        __s32   res;            /* result code for this event */
        __u32   flags;
+
+       /*
+        * If the ring is initialized with IORING_SETUP_CQE32, then this field
+        * contains 16-bytes of padding, doubling the size of the CQE.
+        */
+       struct io_uring_cqe_extra       b[0];
 };
Will it be any better to replace struct b[0]  with "u64 extra[ ]" ?
With that new fields will be referred as cqe->extra[0] and cqe->extra[1].

And if we go that route, maybe "aux" sounds better than "extra".

sorry, picked v1 (rather than v2) here. This part in same though.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux