Re: IORING_OP_POLL_ADD slower than linux-aio IOCB_CMD_POLL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/04/2022 22.58, Jens Axboe wrote:

I'll try it tomorrow (also the other patch).
Thanks!


With the new kernel, I get


io_uring_setup(200, {flags=0, sq_thread_cpu=0, sq_thread_idle=0, sq_entries=256, cq_entries=512, features=IORING_FEAT_SINGLE_MMAP|IORING_FEAT_NODROP|IORING_FEAT_SUBMIT_STABLE|IORING_FEAT_RW_CUR_POS|IORING_FEAT_CUR_PERSONALITY|IORING_FEAT_FAST_POLL|IORING_FEAT_POLL_32BITS|IORING_FEAT_SQPOLL_NONFIXED|IORING_FEAT_EXT_ARG|IORING_FEAT_NATIVE_WORKERS|IORING_FEAT_RSRC_TAGS|0x1800, sq_off={head=0, tail=64, ring_mask=256, ring_entries=264, flags=276, dropped=272, array=8512}, cq_off={head=128, tail=192, ring_mask=260, ring_entries=268, overflow=284, cqes=320, flags=280}}) = 7 mmap(NULL, 9536, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_POPULATE, 7, 0) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux