On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:39:05AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote: > So how about adding ->async_cmd_poll in file_operations (since this > corresponds to ->async_cmd)? > It will take struct io_uring_cmd pointer as parameter. > Both ->iopoll and ->async_cmd_poll will differ in what they accept (kiocb > vs io_uring_cmd). The provider may use bio_poll, or whatever else is the > implementation detail. That does sound way better than the current version at least.
