Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add io_uring_enter(2) fixed file support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> In trying this out in applications, I think the better registration API
>> is to allow io_uring to pick the offset. The application doesn't care,
>> it's just a magic integer there. And if we allow io_uring to pick it,
>> then that makes things a lot easier to deal with.
>>
>> For registration, pass in an array of io_uring_rsrc_update structs, just
>> filling in the ring_fd in the data field. Return value is number of ring
>> fds registered, and up->offset now contains the chosen offset for each
>> of them.
>>
>> Unregister is the same struct, but just with offset filled in.
>>
>> For applications using io_uring, which is all of them as far as I'm
>> aware, we can also easily hide this. This means we can get the optimized
>> behavior by default.
>>
> 
> Did you mean s/using io_uring/using liburing/ here?

I did, applications using liburing as their io_uring interface.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux