Re: [PATCH 0/3] decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 17:52:38 +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> wqe->lock is abused, it now protects acct->work_list, hash stuff,
> nr_workers, wqe->free_list and so on. Lets first get the work_list out
> of the wqe-lock mess by introduce a specific lock for work list. This
> is the first step to solve the huge contension between work insertion
> and work consumption.
> good thing:
>   - split locking for bound and unbound work list
>   - reduce contension between work_list visit and (worker's)free_list.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] io-wq: decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock
      (no commit info)
[2/3] io-wq: reduce acct->lock crossing functions lock/unlock
      (no commit info)
[3/3] io-wq: use IO_WQ_ACCT_NR rather than hardcoded number
      (no commit info)

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux