Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Fix use of uninitialized ret in io_eventfd_register()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:32:03AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:24 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Clang warns:
> >
> >   fs/io_uring.c:9396:9: warning: variable 'ret' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
> >           return ret;
> >                  ^~~
> >   fs/io_uring.c:9373:13: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence this warning
> >           int fd, ret;
> >                      ^
> >                       = 0
> >   1 warning generated.
> >
> > Just return 0 directly and reduce the scope of ret to the if statement,
> > as that is the only place that it is used, which is how the function was
> > before the fixes commit.
> >
> > Fixes: 1a75fac9a0f9 ("io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd")
> 
> Did SHA's change? In linux-next, I see:
> commit b77e315a9644 ("io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while
> registering/unregistering eventfd")
> otherwise LGTM

Yes, this is against Jens' latest for-5.18/io_uring branch, which was
rebased after next-20220207 was released.

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-5.18/io_uring

Cheers,
Nathan

> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1579
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/io_uring.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> > index 5479f0607430..7ef04bb66da1 100644
> > --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> > +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> > @@ -9370,7 +9370,7 @@ static int io_eventfd_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
> >  {
> >         struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
> >         __s32 __user *fds = arg;
> > -       int fd, ret;
> > +       int fd;
> >
> >         ev_fd = rcu_dereference_protected(ctx->io_ev_fd,
> >                                         lockdep_is_held(&ctx->uring_lock));
> > @@ -9386,14 +9386,14 @@ static int io_eventfd_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
> >
> >         ev_fd->cq_ev_fd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(fd);
> >         if (IS_ERR(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd)) {
> > -               ret = PTR_ERR(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd);
> > +               int ret = PTR_ERR(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd);
> >                 kfree(ev_fd);
> >                 return ret;
> >         }
> >         ev_fd->eventfd_async = eventfd_async;
> >
> >         rcu_assign_pointer(ctx->io_ev_fd, ev_fd);
> > -       return ret;
> > +       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  static void io_eventfd_put(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> >
> > base-commit: 88a0394bc27de2dd8a8715970f289c5627052532
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux