Re: [POC RFC 0/3] support graph like dependent sqes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hao Xu <haoxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [27. Dezember 2021]:

> Hi Christian,
> Great! Thanks for the testing, a question here: the first generator
> iouring means BPF-enhanced iouring?

No, actually not. I've only shown the plain io_uring vs. linear
systemcall here. Within the generator, I call the io_uring+bpf just
'bpf'.


> I currently don't have a specifuc use case, just feel this may be useful
> since there are simple cases like open-->parallel reads->close that
> linear dependency doesn't apply, so this POC is sent more like to get
> people's thought about user cases..

That is in principle a good idea. However, as Franz can tell you, for
many uses cases predefining the followup actions does not work. For
example, for reads, it can happen that you get a short read, whereby you
cannot directly continue to the next action.

chris
-- 
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Christian Dietrich
Operating System Group (E-EXK4)
Technische Universität Hamburg
Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 3 (E), 4.092
21073 Hamburg

eMail:  christian.dietrich@xxxxxxx
Tel:    +49 40 42878 2188
WWW:    https://osg.tuhh.de/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux