[PATCH 6/7] io_uring: single shot poll removal optimisation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We don't need to poll oneshot request if we've got a desired mask in
io_poll_wake(), task_work will clean it up correctly, but as we already
hold a wq spinlock, we can remove ourselves and save on additional
spinlocking in io_poll_remove_entries().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index d59d3fa93c9c..20feca3d86ae 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5568,8 +5568,14 @@ static int io_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
 	if (mask && !(mask & poll->events))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (io_poll_get_ownership(req))
+	if (io_poll_get_ownership(req)) {
+		/* optional, saves extra locking for removal in tw handler */
+		if (mask && poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT) {
+			list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
+			poll->head = NULL;
+		}
 		__io_poll_execute(req, mask);
+	}
 	return 1;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux