With IORING_FEAT_FAST_POLL in place, io_put_req_find_next() for poll requests doesn't make much sense, and in any case re-adding it shouldn't be a problem considering batching in tctx_task_work(). We can remove it. Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx> --- fs/io_uring.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index c106c0fbaca2..9a2b3cf7c0c5 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -5485,7 +5485,6 @@ static bool __io_poll_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, __poll_t mask) static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked) { struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; - struct io_kiocb *nxt; if (io_poll_rewait(req, &req->poll)) { spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); @@ -5509,11 +5508,8 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked) spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); - if (done) { - nxt = io_put_req_find_next(req); - if (nxt) - io_req_task_submit(nxt, locked); - } + if (done) + io_put_req(req); } } -- 2.34.0