[PATCH 1/1] io_uring: honour zeroes as io-wq worker limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When we pass in zero as an io-wq worker number limit it shouldn't
actually change the limits but return the old value, follow that
behaviour with deferred limits setup as well.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx # 5.15
Reported-by: Beld Zhang <beldzhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e139a1ec92f8d ("io_uring: apply max_workers limit to all future users")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ac1bc8ac4666..b07196b4511c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -10791,7 +10791,9 @@ static __cold int io_register_iowq_max_workers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(new_count) != sizeof(ctx->iowq_limits));
 
-	memcpy(ctx->iowq_limits, new_count, sizeof(new_count));
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(new_count); i++)
+		if (new_count[i])
+			ctx->iowq_limits[i] = new_count[i];
 	ctx->iowq_limits_set = true;
 
 	if (tctx && tctx->io_wq) {
-- 
2.33.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux