On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:10:11 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> gave very slight boost (nullb IO) for my testing, 2.89 vs 2.92 MIOPS,
> but the main motivation is that I like the code better.
>
> Pavel Begunkov (8):
> io_uring: consistent typing for issue_flags
> io_uring: prioritise read success path over fails
> io_uring: optimise rw comletion handlers
> io_uring: encapsulate rw state
> io_uring: optimise read/write iov state storing
> io_uring: optimise io_import_iovec nonblock passing
> io_uring: clean up io_import_iovec
> io_uring: rearrange io_read()/write()
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/8] io_uring: consistent typing for issue_flags
(no commit info)
[2/8] io_uring: prioritise read success path over fails
(no commit info)
[3/8] io_uring: optimise rw comletion handlers
(no commit info)
[4/8] io_uring: encapsulate rw state
(no commit info)
[5/8] io_uring: optimise read/write iov state storing
(no commit info)
[6/8] io_uring: optimise io_import_iovec nonblock passing
(no commit info)
[7/8] io_uring: clean up io_import_iovec
(no commit info)
[8/8] io_uring: rearrange io_read()/write()
(no commit info)
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
