[PATCH] io_uring: allow conditional reschedule for intensive iterators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we have a lot of threads and rings, the tctx list can get quite big.
This is especially true if we keep creating new threads and rings.
Likewise for the provided buffers list. Be nice and insert a conditional
reschedule point while iterating the nodes for deletion.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/00000000000064b6b405ccb41113@xxxxxxxxxx/
Reported-by: syzbot+111d2a03f51f5ae73775@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>

---

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index fe5e613b960f..ee33d79f9758 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -9137,8 +9137,10 @@ static void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	struct io_buffer *buf;
 	unsigned long index;
 
-	xa_for_each(&ctx->io_buffers, index, buf)
+	xa_for_each(&ctx->io_buffers, index, buf) {
 		__io_remove_buffers(ctx, buf, index, -1U);
+		cond_resched();
+	}
 }
 
 static void io_req_cache_free(struct list_head *list)
@@ -9636,8 +9638,10 @@ static void io_uring_clean_tctx(struct io_uring_task *tctx)
 	struct io_tctx_node *node;
 	unsigned long index;
 
-	xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, node)
+	xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, node) {
 		io_uring_del_tctx_node(index);
+		cond_resched();
+	}
 	if (wq) {
 		/*
 		 * Must be after io_uring_del_task_file() (removes nodes under

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux