On 9/15/21 2:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/14/21 4:34 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> 230d50d448acb ("io_uring: move reissue into regular IO path")
>> made non-IOPOLL I/O to not retry from ki_complete handler. Follow it
>> steps and do the same for IOPOLL. Same problems, same implementation,
>> same -EAGAIN assumptions.
>
> This looks good to me. But I don't think it's against io_uring-5.15?
> Trivial reject, but looks like -next to me.
Was checking out to io_uring-5.15, apparently something gone wrong.
Not only that, but also a chunk left un-amended...
I'll resend against io_uring-5.15
--
Pavel Begunkov
