> > _Not tested_, but something like below should do. will get it > > done properly later, but even better if we already have a test > > case. Victor? sorry been traveling! i can extract out a simple test today... > FWIW, I wrote a simple test case for it, and it seemed to work fine. > Nothing fancy, just a piped read that would never finish with a linked > timeout (1s), submit, then submit a ltimeout update that changes it to > 2s instead. Test runs and update completes first with res == 0 as > expected, and 2s later the ltimeout completes with -EALREADY (because > the piped read went async) and the piped read gets canceled. ...unless?
