For pure poll requests, we should remove the double poll wait entry.
And io_poll_remove_double() is good enough for it compared with
io_poll_remove_waitqs().
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index fe3d948658ad..11eccba5c0be 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4903,7 +4903,6 @@ static bool io_poll_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, __poll_t mask)
if (req->poll.events & EPOLLONESHOT)
flags = 0;
if (!io_cqring_fill_event(ctx, req->user_data, error, flags)) {
- io_poll_remove_waitqs(req);
req->poll.done = true;
flags = 0;
}
@@ -4926,6 +4925,7 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req)
done = io_poll_complete(req, req->result);
if (done) {
+ io_poll_remove_double(req);
hash_del(&req->hash_node);
} else {
req->result = 0;
@@ -5113,7 +5113,7 @@ static __poll_t __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
ipt->error = -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
- if (ipt->error)
+ if (ipt->error || (mask && (poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT)))
io_poll_remove_double(req);
if (likely(poll->head)) {
spin_lock(&poll->head->lock);
--
2.24.4
