On 6/21/21 1:22 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote: > It is quite frequent that when an operation fails and returns EAGAIN, > the data becomes available between that failure and the call to > vfs_poll() done by io_arm_poll_handler(). > > Detecting the situation and reissuing the operation is much faster > than going ahead and push the operation to the io-wq. This now looks pretty good to me. I know you had some data associated with this, would be great to include it in the commit message. -- Jens Axboe